requestId:68499ac66e3301.71085830.
Common understanding of ethics
Author: Yang Guorong (Teacher of the Chinese Modern Thought Civilization Research Institute and Philosophy Department of Huadong Teachers and Professor Jiang Xueren Specially)
Source: “Exploration and Contest” (王) 2019 Issue 2
Time: Confucius was in the 2570s and 8th year of Jihai Eighth in the 25th year of 2019
The fifth day of the month, Guimao
The common sense in this field not only touches and recognizes the positive meaning of related principles, but also means using this as a common guideline for guiding actual action. Ethics consensus takes human existence as the condition of the general theory. The generality of human existence contains the generality of the value layer, which provides internal energy to the inner energy. Ethical common sense is not only about how to be able to be done, but also about why it is needed. From the perspective of conceptual perspective, it achieves ethical consensus or value consensus, and firstly connects with preventing morality and indecent meaning; in terms of practical perspective, ethical consensus provides protection for the social order from one aspect. The ethical common sense that achieves the above meaning is not only a metaphysical condition for understanding the person himself, but also a sense of value, sensory communication and real social conditions.
Keywords: Ethics common sense/value common sense/personal existence/social order
Title notes: The key research base of the teaching department’s humanities and social sciences “Things and things: China under the conflict between ancient and modern China and the West The transformation of modern metaphysical learning” (16JJD720007), the National Social Sciences Planning for the National Classification of Philosophy and Social Sciences of Guizhou Province, “The World Based on the Things: Metaphysical Domain Assessment” (17GZGX03), the National Social Science Fund’s serious project “Royal Philosophy and Thought Research” (15ZDB012), href=”https://www.blog-taipei.online/Jia/”>Purchasing network comparisonJiangsu Province’s “National Morality and Social Style Cooperation in Innovation” research project.
The agglomeration and orderly operation of society will not open up the certain common sense formed by social members on related issues. Social careers develop in terms of differences, and social consensus also appears in a variety of dimensions. Due to differences in social landscape, location, teaching, benefits, etc., members of the social cooperation often understand and understand some social problems. However, the existence and development of society requires constant conflicts of such differences and disagreements. The so-called common sense is that social disagreements achieve a certain level of conceptual level based on the actual needs of social development, through sensory interaction and value communication.Differences.
As well known, Rors once mentioned the reconciliation of common sense. As a certain kind of disagreement that divergent members in social and political cooperation in the field of concepts, this common sense is important in the political field. Although Rors believes that this unconsensual consensus does not preclude the value of philosophy, religion, and morality, he also emphasizes that “in order to find such a common sense successfully, political philosophy must be able to be independent of other departments of philosophy, especially to dispel those long-lasting problems and disputes in philosophy”①. According to Rors’ understanding, to achieve a common sense of reconciliation, we need to maintain a distance between religious, philosophy, morality and other fields with value meaning: “By avoiding various preparatory studies, we strive to draw the deepest disputes between religion and philosophy, so that we can have a certain hope to discover a stable, reconciliational concept.” ② “We should be able to express the public justification as Independently on concepts beyond the various preparatory religious, philosophical and moral ideology. ”③ Overall, the important thing that Rors is concerned about is how to achieve a common sense of justice and justice in the political field. For him, people with different religious and value orientations can temporarily hold back their differences in these fields and achieve a common sense of meaning in the political field.
The common understanding in the political field can be considered in terms of value and other concerns, this is undoubtedly a question that can be discussed. From a realistic perspective, political consensus and value concern seem to be completely different. By entering the ethics field, a closer relationship will appear between common understanding and value. Taking ethical relations, ethical principles, ethical practices and other points of concern, the divergent understanding formed by the ethical field, that is, the so-called ethical common sense, its specific content is expressed as the determination, recognition and reception of certain social cooperation members in the determination, recognition and acceptance of certain price principles and moral norms. What is called confirmation is important to recognize its positive meaning; what is called recognition and acceptance is used as an ordinary guideline to guide actual actions.
Consensus as self-conscious awareness always leads to the perceptual understanding of related problems or objects, and is based on the mastery and understanding of the sensory level. Only the individuals of differences can form a solution to the problem. In the field of ethics, this sensual perception is also integrated with the value consciousness and is connected with each other. Ethics common sense has both the cognitive connotation of the sensory level and the dimension of value.
The above comments are important to what is common sense andWhat is ethical common sense? The question related to this is: In the field of ethics, can we achieve the above common sense? In another way, that is, can it be sufficient to achieve ethical consensus in the value field? This problem can be assessed from the perspective of differences.
On the metaphysical level, ethical consensus cannot be distinguished from the general regulations of people as human beings. As far as real connection is concerned, the more fundamental problem behind ethical common sense is “what is a person”. Historically, there are often differences in understanding what humans are. The so-called humans are sentimental animals, humans are language animals, humans are animals that make things and use things, etc., can all be seen as different worlds of people. From the perspective of ethical common sense, the basic regulations of human beings can be understood from the following levels. First, it is the existence of human life, which is the basic condition of all other value requirements of human beings: if the condition of life exists, all value requirements will not start. Secondly, the unrestrained orientation of human beings, which constitutes the most basic regulation of human beings being different from animals. On the one hand, animals are subject to the limitations of internal necessity: they are more suitable for the internal environment than change. Although some animals seem to show a trend of changing the environment, this change is mostly manifested as a natural activity; on the other hand, animals are subject to their own species. href=”https://sites.google.com/view/sugardaddy-story-share”>彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩彩Marx once pointed out: “An animal is only based on the one it belongs toBaocai standards and needs are built, and people understand that production is carried out according to any standard. “④” According to the standards and needs it belongs to “Build” and expressing that one cannot remove the limitations of related species, “production according to any standard” means that one has the ability to create without restraint beyond the following restrictions. This specific content of creation without restraint is expressed as the object of transformation and the person himself. It can be seen that the inherent limitations and the limitations of internal species make it difficult for animals to achieve an unrestrained state; and the historical perspective of differences is unrestrained, while confirming human nature, it also demonstrates the most basic regulations of human beings being different from animals from animals in one aspect. The third is the pursuit of perfection of human beings. The real connotation hidden behind human perfection is that human development or comprehensive development. This comprehensive development is based on the multi-faceted regulations of human beings, and also presents a landscape of divergent social relations that are aggregated into people’s different social relations. It is neither achieved in one fell swoop, nor will it stay in a certain form of absolute or extreme existence, but is accompanied by certainty.The historical process of the human development process is expressed as the development form achieved in a certain historical period: this development process of a human can be seen as the historical reality t
發佈留言